The political and media debate around Ceuta and illegal immigration has once again shown how disconnected some people are, and how the discussion is poisoned by accusations thrown by the left.
How can one at the same time deplore the situation around the North and South stations in Brussels while praising the policy of the Spanish Prime Minister (Pedro Sánchez), who, with hundreds of thousands of people regularised, creates a pull factor for illegal immigration?
Today, during targeted police operations, 80 to 90% of the people arrested in Brussels are in the country illegally.
The mayors most affected, mostly from the left, all complain about these people who wander around and never comply with orders to leave the territory.
More than 150,000 people are in an illegal situation in our country.
Some invoke humanism when seeing the images from Ceuta.
But where is the humanism when people are left with no future at all in our country?
What use is humanism when the laws determining entry into the territory are not respected?
In the name of what humanism does anyone dare claim that all those who protect our borders, and therefore the law, are far-right or even fascist?
True humanism means speeding up the return of people in an illegal situation to their country of origin. To that end, the MR will table proposals at the start of the new session to strengthen these mechanisms.
True humanism means refusing entry to people who do not meet the conditions for entering our territory.
At the same time, our humanism seeks to welcome refugees under dignified conditions, train them, and guide them towards employment and independence.
Fair humanism means putting in place a chosen immigration policy, ensuring that arrival in our country takes place under the best conditions and that our population benefits from it.
Legal and chosen immigration is an opportunity; illegal immigration is a scourge to be fought.
The real life of migrants and of our population requires a humanism of a dimension that social media theorists refuse to see.